Choosing the right video card could always be the toughest decision you have to do for your pc. It is even more difficult when there are over 100 different available options at hand.
Since video card is one of the most important core components of the computer and it often costs as much as 40% of the total system budget, you must assure a good knowledge of all today video cards before flipping the switch.
If you can get the perfect video card within your preset budget, you will be able to tailor the rest of the system to your needs a lot easier.
5 Ever Simple Tips About Today Video Cards Before You Go Shopping
This article isn’t going to show a master report of benchmarks and technical specs that you obviously can find them everywhere online. I want to give you that essential information to narrow down the best and most affordable graphics card for your custom pc. Let’s get started!
Mainstream Gaming Video Cards Hierarchy
Now with the basics taken care of, we are ready to catch up with all the crazy and confusing video card models here.
How to Use this Chart : The video cards are listed in performance ladder, the best one in the bracket is the first one at the very top.
If you can find one in the higher bracket with a better price than the lower bracket, you might indeed have found a good deal.
Related Tool : 1v1 Graphic Cards Comparison Tool
The Rock-Bottom
A. Tier 1
These are the cheapest video cards you can find on the shelf or they come as the integrated graphics chipset.
They do not have much juice to make any gamer girl happy but they will play nicely with low-budget configuration. When you are in need of a rendering component just for simple screen output, they can be the one.
As the matter of fact, these video cards still offer some good values in them. They can run many 3D Games at the most modest settings and be able to draw two displays simultaneously.
The Radeon HD 5450 delivers the best performance in this rock-bottom level with 80 Stream Processors at 650 MHz clock and is paired with DDR3 memory on a 64-bit bandwidth. You also get Audio channel when using HDMI as an output. Gaming experience is acceptable but not truly commendable.
The GeForce 210 is not totally close to Radeon HD 5450 in term of performance, it lags behind due to the implementation of old DDR2 memory and a low count of processors. However the video card does not release much heat, if any at all. Perhaps, it is more ideal for a HTPC Build since it can play HD videos seamlessly and bless the system with the low-profile characteristic.
The Intel HD 3000 on other hand comes as part of selected Sandy Bridge processors. It puts a small stress on system main memory but not really makes a huge impact. It is a good chipset for both gaming at low settings and high-quality movie playbacks (720p).
GeForce 8400GS still exists on the shelf these days if you have to purchase a cheap PCI-Express video card for your computer. I found a handful of them at Microcenter for less than $25, the clearance was $9. They don't own many reasons for enthusiasts to be really excited about; except that we may buy it and keep for it for another 85 years, just for history record and then resell.
Average Performance in Crysis Warhead - Medium Setting - 1920 x 1080 |
|
Radeon HD 5450 |
23 fps |
Intel HD 3000 |
20 fps |
GeForce 210 |
15 fps |
Geforce 8400GS |
4 fps |
In-Game Sample : HD 5450 - GeForce 210 - Intel HD 3000 |
B. Tier 2
This price range are the most confusing bracket. There are so many existing options for a similar cost but their performance are substantially different. Leading the pack is the Radeon HD 5570 in term of raw power. It supports the latest DirectX 11 for a better compatibility with modern games as well as AMD Eyefinity Technology to drive more than just a single monitor. Right on its tail is the GeForce GT 430 by NVIDIA. Both of these two components give you the best value and performance for the money in this category.
It's also surprisingly good to know that finally integrated graphics processing unit has been up to par with today standard performance, a little. The Intel HD 4000 is slightly faster than the Radeon HD 6450 in processing power, yet it still has much room for improvement before it can come close to the Radeon HD 5570.
In most games, the Radeon HD 6450 offers a playable frame-rate while the Intel HD 4000 is only 4~5 frames ahead. Even though they are both rock-bottom level, you do get the ability to play a lot of 3D games at low settings. The plus side is that they are not power-hungry components, which means you do not need to provide additional power for them to work.
The NVIDIA Geforce 240 is an old architecture yet it still has the power to deliver decent pictures. It can definitely play Crysis smoother than the two next in line but there are drags on the frame rate at some point due to the lack in support for newer DirectX engine.
Consequently, the picture quality of the game are not too impressive. Those who really want to play computer video games but do not want to take risk on a big investment could definitely make use of any of these video cards here.
The bottom of the line NVIDIA Geforce 220 is really outdated at this moment and you should not have your eyes fixed on it. For the same cost, you should get the GeForce GT 520 or 610. We talked about the rebadged product earlier and the GT 610 performs nearly identical to the GT 520. Therefore if you find the GT 520 cheaper then be confident to skip the GT 610 at the moment.
Average Performance in Crysis Warhead - Medium Setting - 1920 x 1080 |
|
Radeon HD 5570 |
44 fps |
GeForce GT 430 |
41 fps |
Intel HD 4000 |
39 fps |
Radeon HD 6450 |
34 fps |
GeForce GT 520 |
26 fps |
In-Game Sample : HD 6450 - GeForce 520 - Intel HD 4000 |
The Entry-Level List
Average Performance in Crysis Warhead - High Setting - 1920 x 1200 8xAA |
|
NVIDIA GeForce 650 |
39 fps |
GeForce GTX 460 SE |
32 fps |
Radeon HD 7750 |
30 fps |
GeForce GTS 450 |
29 fps |
Radeon HD 6770 |
28 fps |
Radeon HD 5770 |
23 fps |
Radeon HD 4870 |
A. Tier 1
- Radeon HD 6770 or GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Radeon HD 5770 or Radeon HD 7750
- GeForce 650 or GeForce 450 or Radeon HD 4870 (discontinued)
The Radeon HD 6770 is extremely similar to Radeon HD 5770 in term of performance. The difference is so little that if you are currently having a Radeon HD 5770 there is absolutely no point to upgrade to a Radeon HD 6770. If you find a good price for Radeon HD 5770, go for it.
My personal advice is skip the new Radeon HD 7750 for now; The current asking price is still higher than a Radeon HD 6770 and its performance is just about the same. This is not a good value video card, yet.
On the NVIDIA offer, you should find the GeForce GTX 460 SE on this list isn't the regular edition. This Special Edition is the trimmed version of the original GeForce GTX 460. It has only 288 CUDA cores (shader units) and a slower memory bandwidth. This GTX 460 SE was released for competitive reason to fill the spot between AMD Radeon HD 6770 and their other lower models. However, it is actually faster than most of the Radeon's in this price range.
On the other front, the new NVIDIA GeForce 650 leads in all games and benchmarks over the rest of the group but not by a far margin to the GeForce GTX 460 SE. However, it runs cooler and more energy-efficient due to the implementation of Kepler architecture.
Once again, you will find similar performance between the two. There is rarely a case to truly recognize the difference. Go with the best price if you just want a good budget gaming video card for the system.
Before we move on to the next category, NVIDIA still has one decent offer up their sleeves. Essentially the GeForce GTS 450 loses a bit of frame rate in comparison to other previous premium video cards but after the recent price cut, it has become a very attractive deal for entry-level gaming computers.
If you happen to get one for lower than $90 mark, you will have a nice computer that plays.
The High-End Options
Average Performance in Crysis Warhead - High Setting - 1920 x 1200 8xAA |
|
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition |
104 fps |
GeForce GTX 680 |
101 fps |
GeForce GTX 770 |
99 fps |
[amazonproduct=B00CU9GOAE] | |
Radeon HD 7970 |
99 fps |
GeForce GTX 670 |
97 fps |
Radeon HD 7950 |
94 fps |
[amazonproduct=B009MML1UA] | |
Radeon HD 6870 Crossfire |
93 fps |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
91 fps |
GeForce GTX 580 |
90 fps |
Radeon HD 7870 |
89 fps |
GeForce GTX 660 |
84 fps |
[amazonproduct=B00966IREK] |
A. Tier 1
The Radeon HD 7870 is alone in this bracket as of October 2012, until we have the next price cut (hopefully). The Radeon HD 7870 seems to be the direct answer to NVIDIA GTX 580 with both deliver almost the same result in many in-game benchmarks.
The Radeon HD 7870 even pulls ahead in more than couple of games when compared to NVIDIA GeForce 660 Ti that has just come out recently. This is the best bang for the bucks high-end video card you can get.
Now the rest of this list are the no-brainer options. The more expensive the video card the higher the performance, to some margin. It definitely will not double the frame rates but it will take care of gaming on a multiple monitors setup a lot easier.
A. Tier 2
When the GTX 660 Ti first came out, it was meant to do scratches to Radeon counter parts in this league. Unlike many other high-end NVIDIA has releaseed in the last five months, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti is blessed with the new Kepler architecture (same as in GTX 680). The GTX 660 Ti is very well-designed; it generates less heat, it consumes reasonable amount of power and it produces really good number of pictures per second.
However, AMD still stands very strong with their Radeon HD 7950 offer which is faster for only a small price difference. Moreover, the key opponent of the GeForce GTX 660 Ti is actually the Radeon HD 7870, per se. Several online benchmarks also reveal that the GTX 660 Ti is only close to, or sometimes a little behind the Radeon HD 7870 in many stressed runs. Now if you are strictly with NVIDIA for Physx or 3D features or maybe you have good experience with them, this is the video card that probably catches your utmost attention.
Perhaps when you are open for options, move on to the Radeon offers in the next price bracket or the one before this. You get a bit more for the money spent.
A. Tier 3
It's about time you meet the best bang for the bucks of the High-End category : Radeon HD 7950. This graphics card has everything it takes to go head on with the more expensive NVIDIA video cards such as the GeForce GTX 670.
With proper overclocking, the Radeon HD 7950 shows its true potential and unlockable horsepower over the older generation Radeon HD 6970. It even outperforms the GTX 670 in many occasions. When you are looking to spend over $300 for a video card and it gives the $400 ones a run for frame rates, you know you have found the one. She's a keeper.
A. Tier 4
I'd rather wait for the price to go down a little more.
Currently, the regular Radeon HD 7970 only gives a few frames higher than Radeon HD 7950. Save the cash for something else :P !
On the flip side, if you really have extra $60 to spend, then you problably should head for the Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition.
What's special ? Unlike the regular edition that only pushes between 10 to 20 fps higher than the Radeon HD 7950 , this is one new kid on the block that took away the crown from the GeForce GTX 680 in the $500 price range. It challenge the GeForce GTX 680 at all edges, dominates all the records that once were only to the GTX 680 and only stays put to the GeForce GTX 690 (but that is an unfair comparison !).
AMD has applied a higher chip binning to make the new edition superior to its older twin. It comes with higher core clock speed (1000 MHz compared to 925 MHz) and memory speed (1500 MHz compared to the original 1375 MHz). As the result, the old Radeon HD 7970 becomes the new untamed beast that fearlessly waits for NVIDIA to bring up something worthy. This is also the best video card for mining bit coin available to the PC market.
What is chip binning ? In short, it is the portion toward the center of the silicon wafer that can produce extremely power efficient, more powerful and higher quality chips than the outer areas. As for a CPU example, we would compare the mainstream processors to the Xeon processors. When it comes to GPUs, it is usually the normal generic video card versus the super-clocked edition, such as GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 570 FTW, etc..
A. Tier 5
To most enthusiasts, the two video cards above are the best value they are willing to purchase for their high-end gaming computer, without breaking the bank or getting a divorce from their wife. One can push the wallet a little further but it's not totally worth the money spend. It comes to the point where the dollars for performance isn't as efficient as they were spent in the lower range.
Lastly, the GeForce GTX 580 sometimes is seen in professional workstations that are specifically tailored for high-definition video editing, graphics design or 3D rendering works. It carries 512 CUDA processors which provides software developers a powerful and easily accessible engine to utilize the full processing resource from these shader units. As the result, graphics-related programs are more optimized to deliver the most efficient output at your demand. Which is an true advantage over Radeon video cards.
2. Conclusion
More or less, I hope it has answered many questions you had about choosing a video card. If you still have any trouble, speak up in the comment section. I’m sure there are many great readers besides me who are willing to contribute their thoughts and experience on the topic :)
Tired of PC Games ?
Play Playstation 1 Games Once Again with this ePSXe and All Plugins
So I thought I’d update you on what I ended up buying: a 4GB Superclocked EVGA GTX 670 for $322. It has taken a long time, but my last parts will arrive in two days!
That sounds like a premium choice, doesn’t it? Well, when your build is completed I’d love to see if you can share it in the forum Computer Showcase section :)
I get a 403 error when attempting to log in.
Here’s another use for high end video cards that seldomly gets mentioned. I don’t game much at all.
BOINC is a collection of individuals that do computing on their own computers for science. You can work on anything from complex mathmatics to Biomedical research to Astronomical discovery. Many of the 50 or so projects allow you to use your video card to do computations in addition to the CPUS. The GPUs do thousands of times faster work. The better the video card, the faster the work output. Imaginary credits are given to each participant as a method of friendly competition. Many of us buy what you call the overkill GPUs because they simply do more work. (I think NASA tracks us all by our heat signature on sattelite imagery…Grin)
We essentially donate our PC’s time and electricity and our home’s AC to these projects so they can produce results thousands of times faster than if they used a supercomputer.
So these cards are not overkill when you get away from the gaming use. There are about 2 million people in the world currently using their PCs for this purpose. So one man’s OVERKILL GPU is a BOINCer’s wet dream.
Wow, thanks for the useful info! I’ve really never heard of it before.
Great guide, very informative. Any plans to slot the Nvdia 650 Ti in there?
Good idea. I’ll be getting one this saturday and hopefully the benchmarks will be ready before the start of next week :)
I am surprised to find HD5570 listed in category of “About $50 Range”. The simple search on Google (let alone places like Amazon, TigerDirect, NewEgg, Buy.com) shows that there are no such cards in that price range on the market. Majority of Radeon HD 5570 cards are in $170-$180 range.
Hey Ramzay, your investigation is absolutely right. However, being a minor offer the HD 5570 does not have much attention for price cut like other premium lineups thus you may not see the most current price change reflected well on the Internet. Here at the local Microcenter store, the HD 5570 is being sold for $69.99 with $15 mail-in. You could also try Google Shopping and find similar cost for the Radeon HD 5570 :D
Hey again!
I am between the GTX 550 Ti, GTX 650, GTX 660, HD 6850, HD 7750, HD 7770 (and, I guess the 6xxx counterparts since you mentioned that there was little difference in the performance).
I will not be anywhere close to using any of these cards to their full potentials, but I might be running a 2x 2560×1440 setup. I don’t game or use any graphically-intensive programs anymore.
This will be for my first build, and I want to make it decently-high-end. I’ve been working more than 10 hours of overtime for the past 7 weeks so affording it is not a problem. My spending will be wasteful with anything I choose, but out of those, which would you recommend to me (if any)?
Are there any key differences between nVidia and AMD for a non-gamer?
Also, many Radeon cards on NewEgg that have 2 DVI ports are listed as having “2 x DVI (1 Single Link, 1 Dual Link)”, such as on here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150599 . No matter how I look at it, it looks like that card has two dual-link DVI-I ports. Does the card downgrade one of the ports to outputting single-link signals, or is the “1 Single, 1 Dual” just misinformation?
The case I want has not been released or even revealed yet (http://www.nzxt.com/evolve), I still have time to think. I can also wait past Black Friday to see if prices drop a little more.
At the moment, the deciding factor between the cards (after I have chosen a chipset) is the aesthetics of the card itself. Well, having two DVI ports helps also.
Thanks for all of your help!
Hey it’s really nice to see you again!
Out of all the choices, the GTX 650 is the only bad bet at this moment. It doesn’t run faster than the GTX 550 Ti (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-660-geforce-gtx-650-benchmark,3297-24.html) and it is expensive.
Now if you are looking for a dual screen setup, the GTX 660 ti or the Radeon HD 6850 / Radeon 6870 is recommended even though maxing out a game at this resolution will stress any video card in this range to an extent. In my personal opinion, avoid buying single-fan video card since the fan has to spin at the higher resolution to dissipate the heat most of the time, as the result the video card runs pretty hot and loud.
Lastly, the Single Link DVI ports may look similar to a Dual Link but it has a portion of the pins disabled.
p.s : I wonder if that case has anything to do with NZXT’s offer for custom paint job :D
Yeah, I was a bit hesitant about the GTX 650, which makes the GTX 660 the least-expensive-but-still-worthwhile Kepler-based video card.
What are the reasons to go with the GTX 660 Ti over the GTX 660 (assuming I wont game heavily)? I will definitely keep the dual-fans thing in mind since I don’t want to make the case louder than it has to be. Well, at least that helps me cut down my options, which helps.
I am still deciding on whether or not to get a second screen. Well, considering the fact that I am renting my current room, and the current desk does not have enough space, I guess that answers my dilemma for now.
I wish that they would make the single-link DVI-D actually look like a single-link DVI-D instead of a dual-link DVI-I. It seems that many Radeon cards are like this, while none/few nVidia cards are like this (not like it matters much at this point, but it would still be nice).
NZXT offers custom paint jobs!? So far, it seems to have lighting control like the company’s Hue unit (but I may be completely off).
Yup, you are right. The GTX 660 is GK106-based with 960 CUDA Cores while the GTX 660 Ti is GK104-based with 1344 CUDA cores. If you are not a heavy gamer you do not have to reach out for the 660 Ti at all.
On the dual-screen setup, I got bored of it after while because I’m not a heavy gamer, either :D I only use it for VMware jobs.
Alright, then the GTX 660 will definitely be my uppermost. Still debating on whether to spend that much on a video card or just settle for something between $90 and $120.
Yeah, the more I think about it, the less I think I will actually use the second screen. I’d watch Daily Show on one screen and read tech news on the other… that’s about it.
Ah, the GTX 650 Ti came out, but it seems that unless it drops to $140 or below, it will not be quite so worth it.
Yeah, the GTX 650 Ti even though is GK106 but with so many cores disabled, leaving it just like a souped up GTX 650 running GK107. GTX 650 is meant to replace the GTX 560 Series but for a little more from the wallet, the GTX 660 really gives a ton more of processing power.
Yeah, I think I will go with eVGA’s GTX 660 if I go with nVidia. Problem mostly solved!